The Radeon RX 5500M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 75 vs 85 Watts
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
80%
Min 1% FPS
25
71%
Price, $
$344.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.26/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$344.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$156.05
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$199.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$442.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$379.95
In Stock
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
144.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.632 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
85%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
46%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5500M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
52.64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
144.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
4.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |