The Radeon RX 5300M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5300M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 85 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
65
75%
Min 1% FPS
32
68%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, $
$529
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$486.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
50%
FP32
4.069 TFLOPS
50%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
168 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
46.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
127.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
4.069 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |