Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 480 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 480 is 1028 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon RX 480
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce GTX 1650 - 96 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 16% cheaper than Radeon RX 480 - $249.98 vs $299.00
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Radeon RX 480 - $2.75 vs $3.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 480 - 75 vs 150 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
91
95%
Value, $/FPS
$2.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $249.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
51%
Radeon RX 480 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$229 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1120 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1266 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |