The Radeon RX 460 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $722.97 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 81% cheaper – $172.02 vs $894.99
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 75 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
30%
Min 1% FPS
22
21%
Price, $
$172.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$894.99
19%
Value, $/FPS
$5.26/FPS
64%
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
9%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |