The Radeon R9 M395X is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
100%
Min 1% FPS
26
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
82%
Min 1% FPS
20
77%
Price, $
$193.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$193.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$82.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
82%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
41%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
