The Radeon R9 M395X is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
86%
Min 1% FPS
26
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$171.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
71%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
