The Radeon R9 M395X is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
89%
Min 1% FPS
26
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
83%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
83%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |