The Radeon R9 M395X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 75 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
48%
Min 1% FPS
26
38%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Dec 1st, 2020
Average FPS
118
100%
Min 1% FPS
68
100%
Price, $
$479.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.06/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$479.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$504.91
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$671.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$707.36
In Stock
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
18%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Dec 1st, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 16.2 TFLOPS |
