The Radeon R9 M395X is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 60 vs 75 Watts
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
100%
Min 1% FPS
26
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Average FPS
48
84%
Min 1% FPS
20
77%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
54%
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
1.389 TFLOPS
47%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 700 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.36 GPixel/s |
92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 43.4 GTexel/s |
2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.389 TFLOPS |
