The Radeon R9 M395X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 75 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
66%
Min 1% FPS
26
55%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, $
$529
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$486.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
36%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |
