The Radeon R9 M390X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M390X
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon PRO W7600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M390X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
55
51%
Min 1% FPS
25
42%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$578.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.41/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon PRO W7600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon PRO W7600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon PRO W7600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M390X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
15%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.99 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M390X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 156.2 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 312.3 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS |
