The Radeon R9 M385X is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M385X
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
46
98%
Min 1% FPS
19
95%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, $
$193.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$193.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$82.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
69%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
61%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M385X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 76.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
