The Radeon R9 390X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 215 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
69
64%
Min 1% FPS
35
57%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, $
$370
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.42/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$370.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$749.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$599.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$768.88
In Stock
Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
59%
Texture Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
65%
FP32
5.914 TFLOPS
65%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$429.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 67.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
| 184.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.914 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |
