The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $464.72 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 61% cheaper – $299.00 vs $763.72
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 275 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$763.72
39%
Value, $/FPS
$4.49/FPS
99%
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
22%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
