In Atomfall, the Radeon R9 295X2 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 295X2
No clear advantages
Arc A770
- Up to 115% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 115% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 29, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 225 vs 500 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
29%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 Apr 29th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R9 200) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
