The Radeon R9 290X is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $14.90 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290X
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 7% cheaper – $210.00 vs $224.90
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 75 vs 290 Watts
Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
96%
Min 1% FPS
31
94%
Price, $
$224.9
93%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
89%
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
176 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.632 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
83%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
53%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 290 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
176 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
5.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
