The Radeon R9 290 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6750 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $191.50 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- Up to 39% cheaper – $299.00 vs $490.50
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6750 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 250 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, $
$490.5
60%
Value, $/FPS
$3.83/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$490.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$898.77
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$918.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
74%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
36%
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.31 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2022 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 166.4 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 416 GTexel/s |
4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.31 TFLOPS |