The Radeon R9 290 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $27.31 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The Arc A750 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 9% cheaper – $271.69 vs $299.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
$271.69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$271.69
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$280.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$293.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
28%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
