The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 190 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
64%
Min 1% FPS
27
55%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
26%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
190 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
