In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 285 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 3080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 285
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 190 vs 320 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
GeForce RTX 3080
- Up to 4350% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 4350% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2020 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 400% more VRAM memory – 10 vs 2 GB
- Up to 400% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3080: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 3080
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
89 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3080: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3080: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
20%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
11%
GeForce RTX 3080
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
760.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.77 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 285 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 3080 Sep 1st, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R9 200) | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
190 W | Power Consumption | 320 W |
