The Radeon R9 280 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 130 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
80%
Min 1% FPS
24
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$171.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
58%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |