The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 3 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 35 vs 200 Watts
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
100%
Min 1% FPS
24
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
85%
Min 1% FPS
18
75%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
20%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
65%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
37%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |