The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
The Radeon Pro W5500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 125 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
73%
Min 1% FPS
24
65%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$163.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
50%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
64%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
64%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
