The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 100 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
74%
Min 1% FPS
24
65%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$290.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
76%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |