The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc B580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 150 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of the Arc B580
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Arc B580 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
37%
Min 1% FPS
22
28%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
135
100%
Min 1% FPS
80
100%
Price, $
$377.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$377.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$358.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs Arc B580 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Arc B580 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Arc B580 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
17%
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2025 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Battlemage |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 456 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 213.6 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 427.2 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.67 TFLOPS |
