The Radeon R7 M260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Average FPS
39
46%
Min 1% FPS
15
33%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
5.72 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
17.16 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
549.1 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 M260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 6th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 17.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 549.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
