The Radeon R7 M260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon Pro W5500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Average FPS
39
53%
Min 1% FPS
15
41%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$151.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
5.72 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
17.16 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
549.1 GFLOPS
11%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 M260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 6th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 17.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 549.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
