The Radeon R7 265 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 265
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 150 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Average FPS
48
60%
Min 1% FPS
21
50%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
31%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 265 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 59.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.894 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
