The Radeon R7 260X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $38.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 19% cheaper – $161.99 vs $199.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
67%
Min 1% FPS
21
57%
Price, $
$199.99
80%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
54%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$161.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
46%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
38%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
38%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
