The Radeon R7 260X is a faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $120.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- A faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 60% cheaper – $79.98 vs $199.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 60 vs 115 Watts
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$199.99
39%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
41%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Average FPS
48
98%
Min 1% FPS
20
95%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
83%
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
1.389 TFLOPS
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 115 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.36 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 43.4 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.389 TFLOPS |
