The Radeon R7 260X is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $111.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 56% cheaper – $88.02 vs $199.99
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 31 vs 115 Watts
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$199.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
54%
Buy on Amazon
$88.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$79.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$65.76
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$69.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$119.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$108.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$71.65
In Stock
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
2%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
$139.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |