The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 95 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
52%
Min 1% FPS
20
41%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
20%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
12%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
