The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 95 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
38%
Min 1% FPS
20
28%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
124
100%
Min 1% FPS
72
100%
Price, $
$746.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.02/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$746.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$580.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$499.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$459.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$599.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$969.15
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
12%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $479.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.2 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 413 GTexel/s |
1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.21 TFLOPS |