The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 95 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
59%
Min 1% FPS
20
48%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
25%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
