In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R7 250X is much slower than the Radeon RX 590 GME. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 250X
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 80 vs 175 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Radeon RX 590 GME
- Up to 3500% faster in Battlefield 6 – 36 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 3500% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 24 days newer – Mar 09, 2020 vs Feb 13, 2014
- Is 6 years and 24 days newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 590 GME: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
36 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
27 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 590 GME: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 590 GME: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250X
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
72 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
15.2 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
38 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
1.216 TFLOPS
19%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250X Feb 13th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME Mar 9th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Released | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $99.00 | MSRP | – |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Polaris (RX 500) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
