The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 4100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $45.04 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 38% cheaper – $74.98 vs $120.02
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
86%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$120.02
62%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
73%
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
39%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
39%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.22 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 76.86 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.46 TFLOPS |
