The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $623.08 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 89% cheaper – $74.98 vs $698.06
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 55 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
35%
Min 1% FPS
16
23%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
121
100%
Min 1% FPS
70
100%
Price, $
$698.06
10%
Value, $/FPS
$5.76/FPS
31%
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
6%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 16.2 TFLOPS |
