The Radeon R7 250 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $923.02 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 92% cheaper – $74.98 vs $998.00
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 55 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
52%
Min 1% FPS
16
38%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
7%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
14%
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
9%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
16%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
