The Radeon R5 M240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 M240
Sep 18th, 2014
Average FPS
40
61%
Min 1% FPS
15
47%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$171.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 M240 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 M240
Sep 18th, 2014
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
8.24 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
20.6 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
659.2 GFLOPS
12%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 M240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 8.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 20.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 659.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
