The Radeon R5 M240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 M240
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 1 GB
Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 M240
Sep 18th, 2014
Average FPS
40
50%
Min 1% FPS
15
36%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
100%
Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 M240
Sep 18th, 2014
Memory
1 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
8.24 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
20.6 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
659.2 GFLOPS
11%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 M240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 8.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 20.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 659.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
