Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for $217.79 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 252 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for $217.79 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 252 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R5 M240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1678 days newer than Radeon R5 M240.

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 227% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon R5 M240 - 36 vs 11 FPS
  • Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 M240 - 4 vs 1 GB
Calculator background
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Radeon R5 M240 Logo
Radeon R5 M240

Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014


FPS

11

31%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

36

100%

Value, $/FPS

$6.05/FPS

100%

Price, $

$217.79

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for $217.79 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 252 minutes ago

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

AMD Radeon R5 M240 Logo
Radeon R5 M240

Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R5 M240 Logo
Radeon R5 M240

Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014


Pixel Fillrate

8.24 GPixel/s

15%

Texel Fillrate

20.6 GTexel/s

22%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R5 M240 Logo

Radeon R5 M240

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

GeForce GTX 1650

Sep 18th, 2014
Apr 23rd, 2019
Crystal SystemGeForce 16
Not Available$149
None1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NoneNone
Mobile
Desktop
1 GB
4 GB
DDR3GDDR5
64-bit128-bit
14.4 GB/s
128.1 GB/s
1000 MHz
1485 MHz
1030 MHz
1665 MHz
900 MHz
2001 MHz

PCs Using Radeon R5 M240 or GeForce GTX 1650

With selected game settings

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.