Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R5 M240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1678 days newer than Radeon R5 M240.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 227% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon R5 M240 - 36 vs 11 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 M240 - 4 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$217.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $217.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 M240 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1030 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |