The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 7900 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $1046.26 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 95% cheaper – $54.99 vs $1101.25
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 50 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 7900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 900% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 7900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
21%
Min 1% FPS
15
12%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Nov 3rd, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$1101.25
4%
Value, $/FPS
$5.73/FPS
24%
Buy on Amazon
$1,101.25
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$964.36
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$882.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,139.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$799.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,201.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,125.00
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 7900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 7900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 7900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
10%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Nov 3rd, 2022
Memory
20 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
800 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
51.48 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 3rd, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $899.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi III |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 20 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 320-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 800 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 459.6 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 804.4 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 51.48 TFLOPS |
