The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $731.97 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 93% cheaper – $54.99 vs $786.96
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
48%
Min 1% FPS
15
33%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
6%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
15%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
5%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
