The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $83.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 60% cheaper – $54.99 vs $137.99
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 50 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
82%
Min 1% FPS
15
71%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$137.99
39%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
49%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
36%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
