The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $107.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 66% cheaper – $54.99 vs $161.99
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 50 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
55%
Min 1% FPS
15
41%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$161.99
33%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
62%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
11%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |