The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $943.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 94% cheaper – $54.99 vs $998.00
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 50 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
50%
Min 1% FPS
15
36%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
5%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
11%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
10%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |