The Radeon R5 230 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 230
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 19 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
The Radeon R5 230 is better in every way
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
$69.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$88.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$79.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$68.06
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$119.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$108.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$71.65
In Stock
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
10.67 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
200 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
83%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
83%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
20%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 230 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
19 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
2.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
200 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
