The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $96.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 130 vs 170 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Up to 58% cheaper – $69.00 vs $165.99
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$165.99
41%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
67%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
62%
Min 1% FPS
16
50%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
22%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 7100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2011 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 500 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
130 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
39.78 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 13.17 GPixel/s |
179 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 52.67 GTexel/s |
5.728 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.263 TFLOPS |