The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $877.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 88% cheaper – $120.02 vs $998.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 50 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
61%
Min 1% FPS
21
50%
Price, $
$120.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
12%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
20%
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
41%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
