The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $51.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 50 vs 170 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Up to 43% cheaper – $69.00 vs $120.02
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$120.02
57%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
69%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
84%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
69%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
69%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
51%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2011 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 500 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 13.17 GPixel/s |
76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 52.67 GTexel/s |
2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.263 TFLOPS |
